Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeneoke, J.

(Pro tempore)

The defendant was found guilty of attempted rape. No motion for a directed verdict was made to the trial eourt. Nevertheless, the defendant now asserts in his only assignment of error that the trial court should have directed a verdict of acquittal.

State v. Kloss, 222 Or 237, 352 P2d 732 (1960), reiterated that even in a criminal case the alleged erroneous rulings of the trial court will not be reviewed unless the alleged error was called to the trial court’s attention by the appropriate procedure. Certain types of alleged errors in capital cases are an exception. State of Oregon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State of Oregon v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. KlossOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API