Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Novo Nordisk Inc
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 2022No. 5:15-cv-00114-PRWUnknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ex rel. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) JAMIE SIEGEL M.D., ) ) Case No. CIV-15-00114-PRW Plaintiff-Relator, ) ) v. ) ) NOVO NORDISK, INC., ) ) Defendant. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Complaint (Dkt. 124) and Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Complaint in Part Pursuant to Anti-SLAPP Statutes (Dkt. 127). For the reasons explained below, the Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Complaint (Dkt. 124) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.