Legal Opinion

Farley v. Weil

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for writ of prohibition to restrain the Municipal Court of the city of New York from proceeding in an action.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

¡Reginald Farley, an infant, by Thomas Farley, his guardian ad litem, on August 26, 1908, presented to the comptroller of the city of New York a demand for adjustment of an alleged claim for $500 damages for personal injuries sustained by said infant by falling upon a sidewalk which had been permitted to be and remain in a dangerous and unsafe condition. The demand was subscribed by the infant, by his guardian ad litem, and by Gillette & Clark, attorneys for the -claimant-. Thereafter, on August 29, 1908, the comptroller caused to be served upon the attorneys a notice, pursuant to section 149…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GroutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magner v. SmythNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lattinville v. ErethNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Threat v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API