Legal Opinion
Lattinville v. Ereth
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLapham, J.
This is a motion on an order to show cause for an order directing the auditor of the city of Rochester to refrain from conducting hearings on the claims of the applicants against the city. The city moves to dismiss the petition of the applicants on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to entitle the petitioners to the relief asked, or to any relief.
On January 10, 1941, the petitioners, husband and wife, filed with the city clerk and the corporation counsel verified claims and notices of intention to sue the city. Helen Lattinville alleged that she suffered personal injuries as a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Curry v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Ottmann v. Village of Rockville CentreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In re GroutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Knox v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1868
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alouette Fashions, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986