Legal Opinion
Mableton Parkway CVS, Inc. v. Salter
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 8, 2002No. A01A1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Where a court has ordered the defendant corporation to designate a witness under OCGA § 9-11-30 (b) (6) to respond to inquiries in certain areas known to the corporation, does the designated witness’s lack of knowledge in these areas justify a finding of contempt against the corporation? We hold that it does and affirm this portion of the court’s contempt order. However, we reverse that portion requiring the corporation to disclose settlement amounts paid in other cases, as such confidential information is irrelevant to this case.
When reviewing a trial court’s findings on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayer v. Interstate Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Tandy Corp. v. McCrimmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Computer Communications Specialists, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Resource Network International, Inc. v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Citadel Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mableton Parkway CVS, Inc. v. SalterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Fowler v. Atlanta Napp Deady, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Kellett v. KumarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Franklin v. GudeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- ORTHO SPORT & SPINE PHYSICIANS, LLC v. JOHN ERNEST SNOWDENCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024