Legal Opinion

Williams Bros. Grocery Co. v. Blanton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1962No. 39148PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

Ground 4 of the motion assigns error because the court permitted counsel for the plaintiff to elicit from the plaintiff’s husband, on direct examination, testimony that the plaintiff “was extremely sore all over her body and she had difficulty in lying down, she couldn’t get up by herself because of this soreness” over the objection that the italicized portion of such testimony was “a conclusion of the witness and inadmissible.” The record in this case shows that counsel for the defendant asked this witness on cross examination whether the plaintiff could get in and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Fred Howland, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. BrouiletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Paulk v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Beadles v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Don H. McGuire v. Emmett Julius DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. National Upholstery Co. v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API