Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bridgett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 2008No. 1070439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

This Court granted certiorari i'eview to determine whether the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this case conflicts with Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963), and Harris v. State, 568 So.2d 421 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial of Jarvis Lamar Bridgett’s motion to suppress evidence in the form of marijuana seized from a lockbox found in a bedroom Bridgett was sharing with his girlfriend. We affirm.

Facts

Investigator Shane Killingsworth of the Huntsville Police Department…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. W.D.H. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. 127 Bayo Vista Condominium Association- OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. WDH v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API