Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. Alling

Rochester City Court

Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGitelman, J.

The defendant has pleaded guilty to the charge of operating an automobile owned by him at a speed greater than legally permitted by the city ordinance. The penalty that may be imposed by the court for this offense is a fine not exceeding $150 or by imprisonment not exceeding 150 days or by both such fine or imprisonment.

The prevention of accidents is the basic purpose of this ordinance. In fact, most of the laws and rules regulating traffic were drawn with only this object in view, namely, the prevention of accidents. Experience has shown that rare indeed is the accident involving two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pasco v. TromblyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. City of Rochester v. NewtonMonroe County Court · 1938
  3. People v. BetarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API