Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Stromberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1919Published

Motion to review taxation of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This motion brings for review a question that frequently arises. An inquest was taken by defendant on its counterclaim. Plaintiff moved to open the default and its motion was granted “ upon the condition that the plaintiff pay to the defendant * * * the sum of one hundred eleven and eighty-five one-hundredths dollars, the costs taxed herein upon the entry of the said judgment and ten dollars costs of this motion, making in all the sum of one hundred twénty-one and eighty-five one-hundredths dollars.” Thereafter the case was tried and the defendant again succeeded upon its counterclaim. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohu v. HussonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  2. Starr Cash-Car Co. v. ReinhardtNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  3. Andrews v. CrossNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Grant v. PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Cahill v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API