Legal Opinion

Cohu v. Husson

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 7, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeals from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of New York affirming a judgment of that court entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order of the General Term of that court, affirming an order granting a re-taxation of costs. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJ. F. Daly, J.

This is an appeal from the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for |931 and costs, entered upon the verdict of a jury. The action was upon a promissory note of defendant for $700, dated February 21st, 1879, to the order of plaintiffs’ *336intestate Henry S. Cohu, payable four months after date. The first defense to the note sued on was that it was given by defendant to Henry S. Cohu in exchange for a similar note of the latter, for their mutual accommodation; that defendant indorsed the note he received, and had it discounted by George B. Ripley & Co., who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dowe v. SchuttNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Davis v. . McCreadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Union Trust Company v. . WhitonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Starr Cash-Car Co. v. ReinhardtNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  2. Lennon v. MacIntoshCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
  3. Kummer v. Christopher & Tenth St. RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Byrne v. Brooklyn City & Newtown R. Co.New York City Court · 1893
  5. Cahill v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API