Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Hirstine

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1964No. 51372PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTiiompsoN, J.

— This appeal brings before us another controversy arising, under the provisions of Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1. The decisive question now before us is the effect of a continuance to a term certain granted by proper order of the court, when the case was not tried and no further continuance granted at the term to which the continuance was ordered.

The plaintiffs’ original petition was filed on December 27, 1961. This brought the case under the provisions of the rule after July 1,1963; and on August 15, 1963, the clerk of the Polk District Court sent the required notice to all counsel of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Windus v. Great Plains GasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Windus v. Great Plains GasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. State v. RourickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Gammel v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Blake v. RupeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Miller v. BonarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Brown v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Kutrules v. SuchomelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Baty v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API