Legal Opinion

In re Rule upon Walker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1897No. Appeal, No. 29PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 29, Oct. T., 1896, by Timothy Ross et al., from order of C. P. Greene Co., Oct. T., 1896, No. 1, Miscellaneous Docket, on rule to remove school directors. Rule upon school directors of the school district of Washington township to show cause why they should not be removed. Before Dickey, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Frror assigned was order discharging rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The act of June 6, 1893, P. L. 330, provides in section 1 that whenever the school directors of any district "shall wilfully neglect or refuse ” to provide suitable school buildings and rooms for the accommodation of all the children of the district then ten or more taxable citizens of the district may petition the court of common pleas for the appointment of a competent *26inspector, whose duty it shall be to visit the district, and on notice to the school board inquire into the facts and report to the court under oath the result of his inquiry, accompanied by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. In re NicklasButler County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georges Township School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Summit Hill School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Slippery Rock Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Schmehl v. WegelinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Schmehl v. WegelinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API