Schmehl v. Wegelin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
927 A.2d 183 (2005)
Jean SCHMEHL and David Schmehl, Appellants,
v.
Ann WEGELIN and Perry Schmehl, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted November 29, 2005.
Decided June 12, 2007.
Sharon Leigh Gray, Esq., for Jean and David Schmehl.
Gregory David Henry, Esq., Tract, Kauffman and Henry, Reading, for Ann Wegelin.
Perry Schmehl, for Perry Schmehl.
Gerald J. Pappert, Esq., Office of Attorney General, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Attorney General.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN AND FITZGERALD, JJ.
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
The question presented is whether Section…
Also in this document: Dissent · Cappy; Dissent · Baldwin.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.