Drummond v. Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether Montana’s Dangerous Drug Tax Act violates the Fifth Amendment’s proscription against double jeopardy.
The district court for the district of Montana affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that a $100-an-ounce marijuana tax levied pursuant to the Act violated the Fifth Amendment. The Montana Department of Revenue (“Revenue”) appeals, arguing that the drug tax is not a punishment and that its imposition against the Kurths does not violate double jeopardy. The Kurths maintain that a criminal penalty by any other name is still a criminal penalty, and that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Kurth RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Connecticut Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. Tobacco Valley Sanitation Service Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993