Legal Opinion

Drummond v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1993No. 91-35878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether Montana’s Dangerous Drug Tax Act violates the Fifth Amendment’s proscription against double jeopardy.

The district court for the district of Montana affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that a $100-an-ounce marijuana tax levied pursuant to the Act violated the Fifth Amendment. The Montana Department of Revenue (“Revenue”) appeals, arguing that the drug tax is not a punishment and that its imposition against the Kurths does not violate double jeopardy. The Kurths maintain that a criminal penalty by any other name is still a criminal penalty, and that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Kurth RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Connecticut Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. Tobacco Valley Sanitation Service Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API