Legal Opinion

Bencomo v. Forster & Garbus LLP

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 15, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01259Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MODESTA BENCOMO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-CV-1259-JPS FORSTER & GARBUS LLP, TD BANK USA NA, and TARGET CORPORATION, Defendants. 1. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Modesta Bencomo (“Bencomo”), alleges in her amended complaint several causes of action, both on behalf of herself and on behalf of a putative class, for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the Wisconsin Consumer Act (“WCA”). (Docket #14). The alleged violations arise out of a debt collection letter she received from Forster & Garbus LLP…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Laura Kubiak v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Airborne Beepers & Video, Inc. v. AT & T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Kevin Miller v. McCalla Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols, and Clark, L.L.C., and Echevarria, McCalla Raymer, Barrett, and FrappierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API