Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gonzalez v. Whitaker

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1982No. 5404Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

In the trial court, Whitaker was denied summary judgment based upon a motion to dismiss. The majority opinion affirmed. In my opinion, plaintiffs’ complaint did not state a claim for relief and was prematurely filed.

On May 20, 1981, plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants. It alleged that Dona Ana Planning Commission granted Whitaker a special use permit for the Whitaker Dairy. Plaintiffs appealed to the county commission. On February 18, 1981, by a 2 to 1 vote, the county commissioners denied the appeal. Under plaintiffs’ Cause of Action, they asserted twelve reasons why…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koeber v. Apex-Albuq Phoenix ExpressNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Phillips v. AllinghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Jellison v. GleasonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Heth v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API