Dawson v. Victoria Lumber Co.

In a former suit between the same parties, to which this is a sequel, we decided that, these plaintiffs were owners of 9/32 of certain property of which this defendant was. then in possession. See Victoria Lumber Co. v. Dawson et al., 159 La. 848, 106 So. 327.

It. seems that in 1908 this defendant acquired all the right, title, and • interest 'Of' 'certain parties to said land, which right, title/ and interest proved to be only 23/32 of the property; but this defendant went into possession of,the whole property, which was’at' that time vacant and unimproved.

It further appears that…