Legal Opinion
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. American Cyanamid Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 30, 1973No. Civ. 148-73PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARTH, District Judge:
This is an action arising under the Lanham Trade-mark Act of July 5, 1946, 60 Stat. 427, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127, for infringement of trademarks registered in the United States Patent Office and for unfair competition. Jurisdiction rests with this Court by virtue of 28 U. S.C. § 1338(a) and (b).
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (hereinafter “Ortho”) filed a complaint on February 2, 1973 against American Cyanamid Company seeking issuance of both a preliminary and a permanent injunction against the use of a proposed trade-mark by Lederle Laboratories (hereinafter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Chips 'N Twigs, Inc. v. Chip-Chip, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Koppers Co., Inc. v. Krupp-Koppers GmbHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fotomat Corp. v. Photo Drive-Thru, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Fotomat Corp. v. CochranDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.