Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1941No. Civil No. 4383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an appeal by the City of Phoenix, called defendant, from a judgment of the superior court in favor of the State of Arizona, called plaintiff, holding that ordinance No. 3081 of said city declaring certain lands annexed to the city is void and of no effect. The facts are not in dispute and may be stated as follows: In the spring of 1940, a petition, signed by the Phoenix Union High School District, hereinafter referred to as the district, was addressed to the mayor and city commission of defendant, requesting that the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 30, township 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Calhoun v. FlynnArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Shepherd v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on-HudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-on HudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Board of Sup'rsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Spence v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API