Legal Opinion

Broussard v. Texaco, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1972No. B-2973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from a trial court summary judgment denying an injunction against the enforcement of a force pooling order of the Railroad Commission. 1 The problem is an original one of statutory construction and the question is whether the order is within the authority granted the Commission by the Mineral Interest Pooling Act of 1965, Art. 6008c, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. We hold it was not.

The facts are undisputed. Joe Brous-sard, II, et al., appellants, are the royalty mineral interest owners under an oil and gas lease dated May 7, 1934, called the Broussard lease,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Board of Water Engineers v. Colorado River Municipal Water DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXASTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bryson v. High Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. BroussardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API