Legal Opinion
Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 3, 1990No. 13-88-581-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
KENNEDY, Justice.
All motions for rehearing are denied. Our prior opinion is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place.
This appeal is taken from an oil and gas case involving an application of the Mineral Interest Pooling Act (Tex.Nat.Res.Code Ann. Ch. 102 (Vernon 1978)) (“MIPA”). Lamon L. Bennett, Jr. and Hazel Bennett Hill, appellants, own a royalty interest in tracts of land located within a gas field designated by the Texas Railroad Commission as the “Limes” field. Pend Oreille Oil and Gas Company, Inc., appellant, owns the working…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nevitt v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Graford Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Daniel v. Dallas Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Gage v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Buttes Resources Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- RAILROAD COM'N v. Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Trees Oil Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- City of Lubbock v. Elkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Ammonite Oil & Gas Corporation v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.