Crow-Spieker 23 v. Robert L. Helms Construction & Development Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In early 1973, John E. Robinson (“Robinson”) and appellant Crow-Spieker #23 (“#23” or “the Partnership”) began negotiations for the purchase of a tract of land (“Tract A”) belonging to Robinson. In a letter accompanying the proposed sale agreement, Robinson granted #23 a right of first refusal on another tract (“Tract B”), just south of Tract A. The right of first refusal was set forth as follows:
As I stated in our telephone conversation of May 3, if and when we decide to sell the parcel of land south of Parcel A, between Kleppe Lane and Greg Street, you shall have the first…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Bradley v. RomeoNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Myers v. LovetinskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Aden v. Estate of HathawaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Maron v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4Cited by23 opinions
- West Texas Transmission, L.P. v. Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Chapman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- FWT, Inc. v. Haskin Wallace Mason Property Management, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.