United States v. Mancinas-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BERNARDO MANCINAS-FLORES, AKA Arturo Morales-Garcia, AKA Bernardo Mancias-Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10094.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009 San Francisco, California.
Filed December 2, 2009.
Daniel Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant.
Lisa Jennis Settel, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges, and Lynn S. Adelman,[*] District Judge.
Opini…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Yijun ZhouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Yijun ZhouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016