Legal Opinion
United States v. Yijun Zhou
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2016No. 14-50288PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Yijun Zhou used fraudulent credit cards at a Target store in Colorado arid at Nordstrom stores in California to buy items worth almost $150,000. The government indicted him on one count of unauthorized use of access devices. Defendant pleaded guilty to that count. At the plea colloquy, the government stated that it would prove the fraudulent Nordstrom charges at trial but did not mention the Target charges. At sentencing, the district court imposed restitution .under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), without objection, for both the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Brett DepueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Lonnie LillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Steven DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Roberto CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.