Legal Opinion

Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1996No. CV-94-0370-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

This is a wrongful death action brought by parents against a travel agency for the death of their 18-year-old son in Mexico. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), Ariz.R.Civ. P., on the basis of social host immunity under AR.S. § 4-301. The court of appeals reinstated portions of the complaint, but affirmed the dismissal of the alcohol-related claims. Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc., 181 Ariz. 394, 891 P.2d 861 (App.1994). Because important questions of law are raised, including the constitutionality of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  3. R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11Arizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Coffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  5. Gianocostas v. RIU Hotels, S.A.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API