Philip Chang & Sons Associates v. La Casa Novato
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CASTELLUCCI, J. *
Plaintiff and respondent, Philip Chang & Sons Associates, a limited partnership, (Chang), brought suit for damages for intentional and negligent misrepresentation against defendant and appellant, La Casa Novato, a limited partnership, (Novato), and defendant, Sue Ann Burge, both individually and in her capacity as general partner of Novato.
A jury rendered a verdict in favor of Chang in the amount of $168,200 compensatory damages and $1,682 punitive damages. The jury found against Novato but found in favor of defendant Sue Ann Burge against Chang.
The Facts
In 1978,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shaffer v. DebbasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Bush v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ceja v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kardly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Norton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.