Legal Opinion

Flowdata, Inc. v. Cotton

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 15, 1994No. Civ. A. No. H-91-3041Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WERLEIN, District Judge.

Pending is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 32), an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 34), a Motion for Oral Hearing on Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 35), and a Motion to Strike Counterclaims Set Forth in Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Document No. 37), filed by Plaintiff Flowdata, Inc. (“Flowdata”). After considering the motions, the responses, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Amended Motion for Summary Judgment and the Motion to Strike…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
Sherrial T. St. Amant v. Ronald J. Benoit and John H. Robichaux, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.