Legal Opinion

Manaster v. Gopin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 3, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action to recover for damage to personal property as a result of water leaking from a broken steam pipe on premises owned by the defendant and leased to the testator of the plaintiffs. The declaration is grounded upon negligence of the defendant in maintaining or repairing steam or water pipes on the demised premises. It is in two counts, one for damage sustained on February 3, 1948, and the other for damage sustained on February 6, 1948.

The action comes here upon an exception of the plaintiffs to the direction of a verdict for the defendant. There was no error.

Facts deduced from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Judkins v. CharetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Mutual Paper Co. v. Hoague-Sprague Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Donovan Motor Car Co. v. NilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Levins v. TheopoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. R. H. Macy & Co. v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Mayfair Fabrics v. HenleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. O'CALLAGHAN v. Waller & Beckwith Realty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Gibbs Realty & Investment Corp. v. Carvel Stores Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Lebel v. BackmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API