Donovan Motor Car Co. v. Niles
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The defendant by assignment has succeeded not only to the rights of the lessors but is bound by their covenants. Peters v. Stone, 193 Mass. 179. The term of the lease was for five years from the first day of August, 1917, and the plaintiff entered into and has remained in possession of the premises until the bill was filed May 26, 1922. But the habendum clause after stating the term, reads, “ Together with the option of renewal on the part of said lessee for an additional term of five . . . years commencing *107August 1st, 1922, provided written notice of its intention to exercise said option is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stone v. St. Louis Stamping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Morgan v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co. v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Wood v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Peters v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Judkins v. CharetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Shannon v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Xanthakey v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.