Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 7, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Lancaster county, Tendered October 1, 1898, in an action of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged breach by the defendant of his promise to marry her on the 27th day of April, 1898.

The declaration states with sufficient clearness and particularity the cause of action, and the demurrer was therefore properly overruled.

It appears that in December, 1897, the defendant, a man fifty-two years of age, received from the plaintiff, who was then twenty years old, a Christmas card. The defendant had met the plaintiff three years before, which was the first and only time he had seen her, though he had in the mean time sent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fish v. Chapman & RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  3. Allen v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Shackleford v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. The Opera Company of Boston, Inc. v. The Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. Bowie v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Trammell v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Vierling v. BinderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Grover v. ZookWashington Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API