Legal Opinion
MacKall v. Wilson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0797PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN S. HUVELLE, United States District Judge on behalf of the Calendar Committee
In this action for a writ of habeas corpus brought pro se, petitioner claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus -(“Pet.”) at 5-6 [Dkt. # 1]. The United States moves to dismiss the petition (1) as time-barred, (2) for failure to exhaust the appellate counsel ineffectiveness claim, and (3) for lack of jurisdiction over the trial counsel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Burt v. TitlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Johnson v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bunch v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Johnson v. MatevousianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lawrence v. WoodsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.