Cummings v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.
{1} We use this case to clarify our jurisdiction over a district court’s denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We conclude that allowing a petitioner to seek a writ of certiorari from this Court in such circumstances is a proper exercise of our original jurisdiction over habeas matters. As for the merits of the case, we deny Petitioner Kenneth Cummings a writ of habeas corpus because his ineffective assistance of counsel claim has no merit, and because the writ may not be used to restore a person’s right to vote.
I. BACKGROUND
{2} While living in El…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SmallwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PeppersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. BacklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Compton v. LytleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- May v. CarltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BarrazaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Martinez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.