Legal Opinion

Lacey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 31, 1983No. 13-81-130-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction by a jury for aggravated robbery. Appellant contends that the court committed error in failing to quash the indictment because the indictment is fundamentally defective and failing to suppress the out of court identification alleging that the photographic spread was impermissibly suggestive. We affirm.

On September 26,1977, appellant and two other men went to the house of Alicia Reyes. Mrs. Reyes opened the door and inquired what they wanted. Appellant showed her an identification badge and said that they were officers looking for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Archie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  2. Autry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API