Legal Opinion
Glidden v. Municipal Authority of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1988No. 54509-0PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Durham, J. —
In October 1986, Patricia Rourke, as trustee under a deed of trust, conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of property in Pierce County. Appellant Municipal Authority of the City of Tacoma (Municipal Authority) was the successful bidder at the sale and received from Rourke a trustee's deed containing recitals that notice of the sale had been sent "to all persons entitled thereto", and that the sale complied in all respects to the notice requirements of Washington's deeds of trust act, RCW 61.24.
The issue presented for decision is what protection these recitals, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Fleming v. Stoddard Wendle Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Enterprise Timber, Inc. v. Washington Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re UptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Walcker v. Benson and McLaughlin, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Merry v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Glidden v. MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF CITY OF TACOMAWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Thomas F. Merry v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. And Nationstar Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015