Legal Opinion
United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided April 25, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
A motion for judgment on the pleadings came on regularly for hearing in the above entitled cause and by agreement of counsel the issues are to be determined upon that motion, supported and opposed by briefs of counsel for the respective parties, including one filed under the application to intervene by Raymond J. MacDonald, as trustee.
This suit was begun pursuant to advices from the defendant, Great Northern Railway Company, that it proposed to drill oil wells on its right of way in Glacier County, Montana, through which the company maintained and operated an interstate…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- People of the State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Mitchell v. SingstadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- People of the State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.