Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Singstad
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 7, 1959No. Civ. No. 10050PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The motion of the State Roads Commission of Maryland, acting for and on behalf of the State, to intervene as a defendant in this action for an injunction under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., is opposed by plaintiff, the Secretary of Labor.
Defendants, Singstad and Baillie, are professional engineers who, under a contract with the State Roads Commission, performed certain services in connection with the design and construction of a tunnel, known as the Patapsco Tunnel Project (Baltimore Harbor Tunnel).
Plaintiff alleges and defendants deny…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Textile Workers Union of America, CIO v. The Allendale Company, Hayward-Schuster Woolen Mills, Inc. v. The Allendale CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Dry Dock Savings InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Martindell v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Local 638, Enterprise Ass'n of SteamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.