Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 11, 2014No. Case No. 09-2269-CMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*1298 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CARLOS MURGUIA, District Judge.

Plaintiff High Point Sari (“High Point”) alleges that defendants Sprint Nextel Corporation; Sprint Spectrum L.P.; Sprint-com, Inc.; Sprint Communications Company L.P.; Sprint Solutions, Inc.; APA.C PCS, LLC; APC Realty and Equipment Company, LLC; and STC Two LLC (collectively “Sprint”) infringe four United States Patents1 (the “patents” or “Patents-in-Suit”). The patents disclose methods for designing and implementing cellular telephone network infrastructure equipment used in receiving and transmitting voice call traffic. Sprint purchased…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Stuart R. Meyers v. Asics Corp., and Asics Tiger Corp., and Hyde Athletics IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Gasser Chair Company, Inc., and George Gasser v. Infanti Chair Manufacturing Corp., and Vittorio InfantiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API