Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hutchins

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 19, 2004No. 07-04-0254-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal, we are asked to determine if the mailbox rule contained in Rule 5 of the Rules of Civil Procedure applies to suits mailed immediately before the effective date of a statute but received thereafter. The statute in question is commonly known as House Bill 4 and found in chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code; it concerns medical malpractice actions. According to the appellants (Michael Bailey, M.D., Jan Rowden, P.A, and Methodist Hospital Levelland, who we collectively refer to as the Hospital), the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Warner v. GlassTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Hearn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Smith v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Whitworth v. Blumenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones v. Khorsandi, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
  2. Pediatrix Medical Services Inc. v. De La OCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Yancy v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. White v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Julie T. Chau v. Select Medical Corporation D/B/A Regency Hospital of Odessa, LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API