Legal Opinion

California Society of Anesthesiologists v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 2012No. A131049PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

In order for hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and critical access hospitals to receive reimbursement under Medicare when a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) administers anesthesia, federal regulations *395require that the CRNA must be supervised by a physician. (42 C.F.R. §§ 482.52(a)(4) (2011), 416.42(b)(2) (2011), 485.639(c)(2) (2011).) However, other federal regulations provide that a state’s governor has the discretion to make a request on behalf of the state to opt out of the physician supervision requirement after concluding, among other…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Nosal-Tabor v. Sharp Chula Vista Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust v. Sutter Health CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Colorado Medical Society v. HickenlooperColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Colorado Medical Society v. Hickenlooper, Colorado GovernorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API