Legal Opinion
Pilchesky v. Redevelopment Authority of Scranton
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Joseph Pilchesky appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lacka-wanna County (trial court) which granted the preliminary objections filed by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Scranton (Authority) in the form of a demurrer relating to the issue of standing and dismissed Pilchesky’s complaint. We reverse.
On December 20, 2005, Pilchesky filed an action for declaratory judgment against the Authority alleging that the transfer of the South Side Sports Complex (Complex) to the University of Scranton (University) was illegal. On February 22,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Payne v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Trustees of the Philadelphia Museums v. Trustees of the UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- White v. Township of Upper St. ClairCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Borough of DowningtownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- P.J. Kabel v. Manheim Twp. SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020