Legal Opinion

Sam B. Hiller, Federal Signal Corp. v. Manufacturers Product Research Group of North America, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Duravision, Inc., Duravision, Inc., Duravision, Inc., Duravision, Inc. v. Federal Signal Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1995No. 93-8421Published

1Opinion of the Court

59 F.3d 1514

27 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 795

Sam B. HILLER, et al., Plaintiffs,

Federal Signal Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MANUFACTURERS PRODUCT RESEARCH GROUP OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DURAVISION, INC., et al., Defendants,

Duravision, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

DURAVISION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,

Duravision, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-8421.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 4, 1995.

Order Denying Rehearing Sept. 1, 1995.

Roger Townsend, Joy Soloway Fulbright & Jaworski, Holman, Hogan, Dubose & Townsend, Houston, TX…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API