Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Castro-Cabrera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 2011No. 10-50163UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Juan Bautista Castro-Cabrera (“Castro-Cabrera”) seeks review of the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment, as well as review of the district court’s grant of the government’s related motion in limine. The standard of review is de novo. United States v. Caruto, 627 F.3d 759, 762 (9th Cir.2010) (district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment reviewed de novo); United States v. Schafer, 625 F.3d 629, 637 (9th Cir.2010) (district court’s decision to exclude evidence of a particular defense reviewed de novo).
A grand jury returned an indictment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Alfred Minasyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Javier Ontoniel Bustamante-Barrera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Sandoval-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Castro-Cabrera v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012