Gunderson v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentO’Brien, J.
Even though intimately familiar with the issues and knowledgeable as to the scientific principles presented in a case, an administrative law judge (ALJ) is not an expert. The ALJ is not expected, nor permitted, to meld expert opinion into his own unified theory, which he then independently applies to the facts. And it is beyond the ken of an ALJ to resolve a scientific debate. Instead, once the ALJ determines “an expert’s testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand,”1 the only issue *1028is credibility. When expert opinion is diametrically opposed, the ALJ…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.