Legal Opinion

State v. Geltzeiler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants were indicted and convicted in the Essex Court of General Quarter Sessions for possessing and selling certain liquor contrary to the provisions of Pamph. L. 1922, ch. 255, known as the Hobart act. The judgment entered upon the conviction was removed by writ of error into the Supreme Court, where it was affirmed. Error thereupon was brought into this court.

Our examination of this case has led us to the conclusion that the judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed and for the reasons given in its per curiam, except that the Supreme Court’s deliverance on the first point…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Francis Noboru YoshidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. LaloucheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. State v. KollarikSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. State v. GleitsmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API