Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 26, 1986No. 12619; 12620PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The defendant was charged in a three count substitute information with murder and felony murder, kidnapping in the first degree and the commission of a capital felony. In a separate substitute information he was charged with larceny in the first degree and robbery in the first degree. Both infor-mations arose from the same incident and were tried together to a jury. The defendant was convicted of all five counts and sentenced by the trial court to an effective sentence of seventy years. See General Statutes § SSa-SSb.1 The defendant took separate appeals from his convictions on both…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. United States v. Jerome BerardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API