Legal Opinion

Oginskas v. Fredsal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

May Street, in the borough of Naugatuck, runs in an easterly and westerly direction and is intersected at approximately a right angle, from the north, by Johnson Street. On May Street the grade ascends from west to east and Johnson Street is an ascending grade northerly from May Street. On December 13th, 1926, at about five o’clock p. m., the defendant’s truck driven by his employee, one Baummer, traveled easterly along May Street and had started to turn to its left into Johnson Street when a sled on which the plaintiff’s decedent and another boy were coasting westerly down May Street…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Robinson v. BackesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  3. Sedita v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Horton v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Maroncelli v. StarkweatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porcello v. FinnanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Perkel v. GraysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. King v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API