Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Mercantile Bank & Trust

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 30, 1988No. 04-88-00309-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Plaintiff, Mercantile Bank & Trust, sued defendants, Bruce Hooper and his mother, Ruth S. Hooper, on a promissory note with Bruce as the maker and Ruth the guarantor. The Bank prevailed and the defendants appeal, urging ten points of error on appeal.

Stating that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment, the defendants contend that (1) the Bank failed to establish there was no genuine issue of fact; (2) a fact question of offsets and credits was not considered; (3) the Bank violated section 3.306 of the TEX.BUS. &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cove Investments, Inc. v. MangesTexas Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doncaster v. Hernaiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  2. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver of Community Savings & Loan Association v. Peter JuergensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Blocker v. Terrell Hills City, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Lupo v. Equity Collection Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API