Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Heard

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1963No. 42547Published

1DissentMcGehee, C. J.

The controlling opinion herein begins with the statement: “The question is whether a nonresident of Mississippi, who pays the owner for the privilege, may fish *788in a privately owned, land-locked lake in this state without first obtaining the fishing license required of nonresidents by Mississippi Code 1942, Bee., section 5904. Miss. Laws 1956, ch. 151.” (Italics mine). "Whereas the brief of the appellant contains the following statement: “The affidavit charging the offense in this case merely charged appellee with fishing without a license but, in view of the stipulation filed herein, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State Game & Fish Commission v. Louis Fritz Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Harper v. LambCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Draffen v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API