Legal Opinion

E. B. Hayes Machinery Co. v. Eastham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 5, 1920No. 22514PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge. Action by the E. B. Hayes Machinery Company against J. H. Eastham and others. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

Plaintiff, a Texas corporation, sued the defendants, J. M. Eastham, J. W. Clarke, and Lee Kinnebrew, as members of. an alleged commercial partnership, styled the Universal Fiber Gin Company, for a balance on open account of $2,388.18 for machinery alleged to have been sold and de*349livered to said Universal Fiber Gin Company in the city of Marshall, Tex.

Defendants excepted on the ground that the petition disclosed no cause 'or right of action, and, this being overruled, answered, denying all of the allegations of the petition, and averring that they were not partners in any sense, and had not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Savage v. . O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Flato v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Trappey v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Coast v. Hunt Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. LobbanTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. Edco Properties v. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API