Legal Opinion

Head v. Porter

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 3, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by Charles Head, as administrator of'William S. Smoot, against Samuel W. Porter, master armorer at the Springfield armory, for infringement of a patent. Heard on plea to the jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The plea in tbis case raises the single question of jurisdiction. The suit was originally brought by William-S. Smoot, the cotn-plainant/s intestate, against James G. Benton, an officer of the United States army in command of the national armory at Springfield, Mass., charging him with infringement of two patents, dated, respectively, January 1, 18(57, and August 27, 1867, for improvements in cartridge retractors for breech-loading fire-arms. Subsequently the defendant died, and thereupon the complainant moved to amend his bill by substituting the present defendant, Porlei;, master armorer at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Postal Supply Co. v. BruceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API